Short description of variables in WifOR Institute’s
Extended Input-Output model

October 2025
For detailed indicator descriptions and data sources please consult our method documentation.
The term ‘value’ in this documentation is used irrespective of its positive or negative polarity.

Environmental indicators

Indicator

Air Pollution

Units: Physical pollution in kg, societal value in USD

Description

Air pollution describes the contamination of the indoor or outdoor environment by any chemical, physical, or biological agent that modifies the natural characteristics of the atmosphere.

Sub-indicators

Pollutants: Ammonia (NH3), Nitrogen Oxide (NOx), Particulate Matter ≤2.5 (PM2.5), Particulate Matter ≤10 (PM10), Sulphur Oxides (SOx), Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (NMVOC), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) etc.
Localization: Urban, Peri-urban, rural, and transportation

Valuation Approach

The valuation of effects arising from air pollution follows the recommendation of the federal German environmental agency (UBA) (Bünger & Matthey, 2020) which provides cost rates which express societal damages related to:

  1. Health damages (e.g., respiratory diseases)
  2. Biodiversity loss (e.g., species extinction)
  3. Crop/harvest damages (e.g., losses in agricultural yield)
  4. Material/infrastructure damages (e.g., facade staining)

Annual Leakage of Plastics to the Oceans

Units: Leakage of plastics to the ocean in tonnes, societal value in USD

Focuses on the effects of macro-plastic on ecosystem services of oceans caused by maritime plastic leakage. Macro-plastics are fragmentations of plastic larger than 5 mm. Plastic leakage usually originates from mismanaged waste.

Valuation considers the impact of leaked plastic to the aquatic environment, the transportation, fragmentation, and degradation of plastic.
The annual amount of leaked plastic into the ocean is calculated and divided by the total global plastic production to determine an ocean leakage rate. Data on plastic leakage into aquatic environments is sourced from the OECD, and plastic production mass is aligned with PlasticsEurope figures. This global ocean leakage rate is applied uniformly across countries to estimate the quantity of plastic entering the ocean. The estimated amount of leaked plastic is multiplied by the minimum cost per ton to derive the total damage costs for marine ecosystem service loss.

Biodiversity Impacts

Units: Societal value in USD

Biodiversity describes the variety of living species on Earth, including plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi. Estimated impacts on biodiversity from single human activities are calculated using an abatement cost approach, which values biodiversity based on the cost of preventing its decline.

The valuation approach uses (Steen, 2020) model to estimate impacts on biodiversity from single human activities (such as land use change, pollution, species introduction, etc.) using an abatement cost approach, which values biodiversity based on the cost of preventing its decline. This approach incorporates two steps:
First, the global share of species threatened by a specific human activity is divided by the total amount of this activity.Second, the environmental impact factor is multiplied with an estimate of the annual global biodiversity conservation costs to arrive at a global biodiversity impact value in monetary units per unit of the human activity under consideration. Excludes costs of managing Invasive Alien Species (see below).

Fishery

Units: Extracted aquatic life in tonnes

The Fishery indicator captures the total biomass extracted from aquatic ecosystems, including aquatic plants, fish from in-land waters and marine and other aquatic species.

Fishery Aquatic Plants in Tonnes, Fishery Marine Fish catch in Tonnes, Fishery Inland Waters Fish catch in Tonnes
Fishery Other (e.g. Aquatic mammals) in Tonnes

Not valued

Forestry

Units:
Industrial Roundwood (Certified/Non-Certified SFM) in kg
Wood Fuel incl. Pellets (Certified/Non-Certified SFM) in kg
Kapok Fruit in tonnes
Natural Gums in tonnes

Measures the extraction of forest-based products, including roundwood, wood, fuel, kapok fruit and natural gums.
Part of the indicator covered under Material.

Industrial Roundwood (Certified/Non-Certified SFM) in kg
Wood Fuel incl. Pellets (Certified/Non-Certified SFM) in kg
Kapok Fruit in tonnes
Natural Gums in tonnes

Not valued

Fossil Fuels

Units: Coal in tonnes
Natural Gas in Mio. m3
Oil shales in tonnes
Petroleum in tonnes

Captures extraction of non-renewable energy sources, contributing to energy use and GHG emissions.
Part of the indicator covered under Material.

Coal in tonnes
Natural Gas in 1,000,000m3
Oil shales in tonnes
Petroleum in tonnes

Not valued

Green House Gases (GHG)

Units:
CO₂-equivalent emissions in kg (CO₂e), societal value in USD

GHGs are measured according to their global warming potential (GWP), whereby CO2 is taken as a baseline and the GWP of other gases is measured relative to the same mass of CO2 (called CO2 equivalents, short CO2e).

Pollutants: Includes greenhouse gases as defined in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 6th Assessment report

Applies the widely used concept of social costs of carbon (SCC), utilizing the DICE model developed by (Barrage & Nordhaus, 2024). The SCC measures the damage caused by emitting an additional ton of GHG into the atmosphere, taking into account the impacts across all future years. The SCC is calculated based on an assumed future emission trajectory and is derived via so called integrated assessment models which combine economic modelling with climate models.

Grazing

Unit: Biomass consumed by animals in tonnes

Measures the amount of plant biomass consumed by animals through grazing activities.

Not valued

Invasive Alien Species

Units: Societal value in USD

Invasive alien species (IAS) are plants, animals, and microorganisms introduced, either intentionally or unintentionally, into regions where they are not native, affecting local ecosystems.

The indicator covers only invasive alien plants, based on the cost of preventing biodiversity from declining – an abatement cost approach.

Biodiversity conservation costs: An estimation of the global value of invasive alien species recently published in Financing Nature was expressed as the total financial costs of managing IAS impacts globally.

Global impact factor: To derive the global impact factor for invasive alien plants, the total annual costs attributed to invasive plant species were first estimated. This was done by calculating the share of costs specifically caused by invasive plants.

Local adjustments: To adjust for local impacts, we assume that the number of threatened species by IAS per country, influenced by country size, correlates with the severity of biodiversity loss and associated costs

Land Use

Units: ha, societal value in USD

Land use describes the management and modification of a natural environment into a built environment including settlements and semi-natural habitats such as arable fields, pastures, managed woods, and urban environments.

Land Use Agriculture: Animal rearing, cereal grains, crops, oilseeds, paddyrice, plant-based fibres, sugarcane, & sugarbeet, vegetables, fruits & nuts, wheat
Land Use Forestry
Land Use Paved Land Use Total

Working capacity: Builds on (Swedish Life Cycle Center, 2015) EPS (2015) using (Steen, 2016). Paved surfaces cause an increase in temperature in densely populated areas. This effect, known as urban heat island effect, increases in combination with global warming.

Drinking water treatment costs: A second important driver of land use impact is the effect on drinking water. We obtain the elasticity of water production costs with respect to the different types of land use surrounding the water source from (Price & Heberling, 2020).

Biodiversity preservation costs: Lastly, we estimate the impact from land use on biodiversity costs based on (Deutz et al., 2020).

Material

Units: Tonnes, societal value in USD

Captures the extraction or use of specific raw materials, reflecting resource intensity and environmental footprint of economic activities. Includes metals, minerals, and other non-renewable resources.

Materials: Aluminium, Antimony, Arsenic, Asbestos, Baryte, Bauxite, Bentonite, Beryl, Bismuth, Boron, Cadmium, Cement, Chromium, Cobalt, Copper, Diamond, Diatomite, Feldspar, Fluorspar, Gallium, Germanium, Gold, Graphite, Gypsum, Indium, Iodine, Iron, Kaolin, Lead, Lignite, Lithium, Magnesite, Magnesium, Manganese,
Mercury, Mica, Molybdenum, Nickel, Niobium and Tantalum, Palladium, Perlite, Phosphate Rock, Platinum, Potash, Rare Earth, Rhenium, Rhodium, Salt, Selenium, Silicimanite, Silver, Strontium, Sulfur, Talc, Tellurium, Tin, Titanium, Tungsten, Uranium, Vanadium, Vermiculite, Wollastonite, Zinc, Zirconium

The valuation approach applies the model by (Huppertz et al., 2019) to estimate the social cost of resource depletion by adjusting market prices with a correction factor that reflects societal discount rates, externalities, and intergenerational equity. It monetizes the hidden environmental and social costs of resource extraction, providing a socially optimal price that internalizes long-term sustainability considerations.

Primary Crops

Units: Tonnes

Measures the volume of raw agricultural crop output across a wide range of plant-based commodities. Reflects land use intensity, food production, and supply chain dependencies.
Captures only the physical quantity of crops produced across categories such as fruits, vegetables, grains, legumes, fibers, oilseeds, and specialty crops.

Examples:

Fruits: Apples, Bananas, Grapes, Mangoes, Oranges

Vegetables: Tomatoes, Onions, Carrots, Spinach, Cucumbers

Grains (Cereals): Maize, Wheat, Rice, Barley, Sorghum

Legumes & Pulses: Lentils, Chickpeas, Soybeans, Cow Peas, Beans (Dry)

Oilseeds & Nuts: Sunflower Seed, Groundnuts, Almonds, Sesame Seed, Rapeseed

Fibers: Cotton Lint, Jute, Flax Fibre, Hemp Fibre

Spices & Condiments: Chillies, Pepper, Ginger, Cloves, Nutmeg

Specialty Crops: Tea, Coffee, Cocoa Beans, Tobacco Leaves, Vanilla

Not valued

Waste

Units: kg, societal value USD

Economic activities result in the generation of solid waste at almost all levels in the supply chain. Poor waste management contributes to climate change and air pollution, and directly affects our ecosystems.

Hazardous Waste:
Disposed:
Incinerated, Landfill
Total (kg and USD – monetized)

Non-Hazardous Waste:
Disposed: Incinerated, Landfill
Recovered: Recycling or Downcycling

Total (kg and USD – monetized)
Overall:
Waste Total (kg and USD)

The valuation of solid waste follows a mixed approach:

Air emission: The incineration of waste releases traditional air pollutants (NOx, SOx, PM2.5 and PM10) and in
the case of hazardous waste also dioxins and heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium,
mercury, nickel, lead). Valuation coefficients that express health damages are provided by (EXIOPOL Project Consortium, 2009).

GHG emissions: Arise from hazardous and non-hazardous waste and in both landfills, and incineration plants. While CO2 is the dominating GHG from incineration, landfills produce a large
amount of methane (CH4).

Disamenity: Adverse localised environmental outcomes of waste management sites include noise, odor, pests, and visual intrusion. To estimate the value of disamenity arising from living close to a waste management facility, the societal values of reduced housing prices are used as a proxy

Leachate: A type of fluid that percolates through the landfill and is generated from liquids
present in the waste or from outside water.

Water Consumption

Units: m³, societal value in USD

Global water systems feed a growing human population, provide sanitation, and foster blooming ecosystems. Draughts and unproportional withdrawal from that water cycle increase the stress on our water systems.

Blue water: Fresh surface and groundwater (rivers, lakes, aquifers) that can be withdrawn for human use.
Green water: Rainwater stored in soil and used directly by plants through evapotranspiration.

The valuation approach for consumption of blue water follows a three-step procedure: first, it quantifies economic damages from water scarcity using a global shadow price for agricultural water losses (5.89 USD/m³); second, it regionalizes this value through AWARE (Available WAter REmaining) scarcity factors to reflect local water availability; and third, it monetizes human health damages by converting local water-consumption-related Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) into monetary terms yielding country-specific valuation coefficients in USD/m³. The conversion applies a Value of Statistical Life (VSL) factor universally assumed at 200,000 USD/DALY, i.e. at the higher end of alternative estimates (Robinson et al., 2017; Schlander et al., 2017; Trautmann et al., 2021).

Water Pollution

Units: in kg, societal value in USD

Many economic activities cause pollution of freshwater through uncontrolled release of chemicals and other substances, if not well managed. These uncontrolled emitted substances can be distinguished in inorganic, organic, and nutrients. Controlled wastewater and its treatment are not considered in our valuation approach.

Pollutants: Antimony, Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Nitrogen, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons), Phosphorus, and Zinc.

(Steen, 2020) provides separate monetary valuations of the substances Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), and Mercury (Hg) which have an effect on water pollution to freshwater. In order to be able to monetize the impact of the additional substances mentioned above, we use the relations between the provided and calculated health related impacts of inorganics by (USEtox, 2015).

Labor and Employment Indicators

Indicator

Disability Pay Gap

Units: Societal benefit or cost in USD

Description

The violation of equal treatment regarding, among others, people with disabilities, is mentioned as a human rights risk according to §2 paragraph 2 No. 7, within the framework of the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG).

Sub-indicators

Valuation Approach

The lost income is translated into DALYs by multiplying it with the Health Utility on Income (HUI) factors that capture the relationship between health and income and monetized via the VSL. The total impact is calculated as:
Employees with disabilitys,c × disability pay gap per affected persons,c × HUI × VSL. With c=country and s=sector

Employee Benefits

Units: In USD

This measures non-wage compensation expenses by skill level (low, medium, high) and in total.

Not valued

Employees With Disability

Units: Employees with disability per 1000 persons

Measures number of employees identified as living with a disability.

Not valued

Employees Without Disability

Units: Employees without disability per 1000 persons

Measures number of employees without a disability.

Not valued

Female Employment

Units:
1000 FTEs,
1000 Persons

Measures male participation in the labor force, both as full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs and total headcount.

Skill Level: High, Medium, Low, Total

Not valued

Male Employment

Units:
1000 FTEs,
1000 persons.

Measures male participation in the labor force, both as full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs and total headcount.

Skill Level: High, Medium, Low, Total

Not valued

Fair Wages

Units: Societal value in USD

The fair wages indicator challenges the assumption that every job has a positive impact on society. It assesses the quality of employment by valuing the impact of the wages paid to employees on their quality of life with respect to a threshold (living wage).

Wage gap monetization based on:

Wage Type: Negative Gap, Negative, Net, Positive

Skill Level: Low, Medium, High, Total

Family Type: Single Working Parent, Typical Family

Living wages: The living wages reflect a wage that allows a basic but decent life, considering local contexts. The living wage usually includes the cost of food, housing, health, and education, as well as other necessary basic spending (e.g., transport, communication, etc.) and reserve for unexpected events. It is calculated accounting for different family situations, particularly in terms of the number of kids and working parents.

Health Utility of Income (HUI): The HUI factors indicate how many DALYs are gained per USD of income.

Living wage gap

Units: USD

The living wages reflect a wage that allows a basic but decent life.

Wage gap based on:

Wage Type: Negative Gap, Net Gap, Positive Gap

Skill Level: Low, Medium, High, Total

Family Type: Single Working Parent Family, Typical Family

The living wage gap is the wage withheld or paid above the living wage.

People Getting Paid Above Respective Living Wage

Units:
Number of persons

Measures the number of employees earning more than the living wage threshold, segmented by family type. Wages above the living wage have a positive impact on life expectancy.

Family Type: Single Working Parent Family, Typical Family

Not valued

People Getting Paid Below Respective Living Wage

Units:
Number of persons

Measures the number of employees earning less than the living wage, segmented by family type. Highlights risk of income insufficiency and social vulnerability. Wages below the living wage therefore have a negative impact on life expectancy.

Family Type: Single Working Parent Family, Typical Family

Not valued

Freedom of Association

Unit: Societal value in USD

The failure to respect freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining is mentioned as a human rights risk according to §2 paragraph 2 No.6. Within the framework of the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG).

The monetization approach aims to express the negative impact associated with violations of freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining in a monetary value.
To capture the complete impact in monetary term, the impact per affected person is multiplied with the physical indicator, i.e., the number of affected employees.

Jobs created

Units: Headcount in 1000 persons and in 1000 FTE

The employment level is defined as the number of people engaged in productive activities in an economy. The concept includes both employees and the self-employed.

Categorized by skill level, high, medium, low and measured in two ways.

Not valued

Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) / Occupational injuries and illnesses

Units: Total cases (Fatal, Nonfatal),
societal value in USD

Occupational health deals with all aspects of health and safety in the workplace and has a strong focus on primary prevention of hazards. The focus of these indicators is on the societal impacts arising from injuries and illnesses resulting from incidents that happen during the course of employment.

Fatal: OHS Disease/Illness Fatal Cases

Nonfatal: OHS Disease/Illness Nonfatal (Cases by type of absence (Short, Long) and incapacity (Full, Partial))

Severity level: Short, long absence

This valuation focuses on the impacts on wellbeing of affected employees due to health impairments. As the impacts of injuries and illnesses depend on the type, severity and duration, a normalization of the variety of health impairments is necessary. Different health states are commonly translated into DALYs to measure the burden of disease. DALYs express the sum of years of life lost due to premature mortality (YLL) and years lived with disability (YLD).

Working Overtime

Units: in cases and USD

The lack of measures to prevent excessive physical and mental fatigue, particularly through inadequate
work organization regarding working hours and rest breaks. The indicator Working Overtime
was developed to capture this potential risk along the supply chain.

The monetization approach aims to express the negative impact that occurs due to working overtime in a monetary value. As a first step, the negative health impact related to working overtime is expressed in terms of disability adjusted life years (DALYs). The second step is a valuation of DALYs with the VSL which is supposed to capture the economic value of one year of a human life lived in a good condition of health which corresponds
to USD 200,000

Social and Human Rights Indicators

Indicators

Child Labor in Children

Units: Cases, societal value in USD

Description

Child labor is defined as work that deprives children of their childhood, their potential and their dignity, and that is harmful to physical and mental development (ILO, 2019). A case of child labor is defined as a child engaged in economic activities for more than one hour per week if aged 5-11, for more than 14 hours per week if aged 12-14, and for more than 43 hours per week if aged 15-17.

Sub-indicators

Valuation Approach

Returns to schooling and the estimate for income and productivity: The absolute productivity loss per year is calculated by multiplying the return to schooling (in percentages terms) by the average income in the country.

Adult working life: To estimate lifetime income and productivity losses, the adult working life in the country is considered, calculated as the difference between age 18 and the official retirement age.

Forced labor

Units: Cases, societal value in USD

Forced labor exploitation is defined as work forcefully imposed by private agents, including
bonded labor, forced domestic work, and work imposed in the context of slavery or vestiges of
slavery. Other forms of forced labor, e.g. forced sexual exploitation and state-imposed forced
labor, are not considered here.

Combines:
Mental health impact: Evaluate the quality-of-life reduction through the experience of psychological distress by translating it into DALYs.
Unduly withheld income: Incurred negative impacts through the underpayment of forced labor victims (non-domestic and domestic forced labor)

Rule of Law

Units: Cases, societal value in USD

The Rule of Law indicator was developed to capture the potential risks of human rights abuse by security forces and further human rights violations along the supply chain.

The monetization approach aims to express the negative impact related to violations of the rule of law in a monetary value. The valuation is based on a study by (Pinzon-Rondon et al., 2015) who examined the relationship between the rule of law and health outcomes, measured among others in terms of life expectancy.

Land Eviction

Units: Cases, societal value in USD

The unlawful violation of land rights is mentioned as a human rights risk according to §2 paragraph 2 No.10 within the framework of the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). The approach aims to identify affected workers within the agricultural sector that lose their work opportunities and consequently their income due to illegal land eviction deals.

Aims to express the negative impact related to unlawful land eviction deals in a monetary value. This approach is mainly based on the FAO Dataset on Family Farming (smallholders). It contains information about hous ehold income and household size per country. Based on this data, the income per person is calculated.

Gender Pay Gap

Unit: Societal value in USD

The indicator values impact arising from gender inequality expressed in terms of the differences in earnings between men and women.

Gender Pay Gap: The GPG data is expressed in percentage, i.e., how much less or more women earn in a respective sector and country compared to men
Gender Inequality Index (GII): The United Nation’s indicator for measuring gender inequality, the GII depicts three dimensions as measurements for inequality among men and women: reproductive health, empowerment, and the labour market. The GII ranges from 0 to 1, where a low value of the GII indicates low inequality between women and men and vice-versa.

Economic indicators

Indicators

GDP contribution

Unit: Million USD

Description

Represents the direct and indirect value added generated by an economic activity or sector, expressed in terms of monetary contribution to national or regional GDP. Output (at basic prices) minus intermediate consumption (at purchaser prices).

Sub-indicators

Valuation Approach

Not valued

Human capital

Unit: Training in hours,
Societal value in USD

Captures the investment in employee education and training.

The valuation approach estimates the societal value of training by extrapolating returns to schooling (Psacharopoulos & Patrinos, 2018) to adult learning, converting the income return to one year of education into an equivalent return per hour of training using country-specific instruction hours. These training returns are then multiplied by sectoral productivity and accumulated over the remaining working life of employees—adjusted for retirement age, life expectancy, and discount rates—to capture the long-term economic benefits of human capital formation.

Intermediate Consumption

Unit: million USD

Represents the value of goods and services consumed during production processes, excluding fixed capital.

Not valued

For detailed indicator descriptions please view our method documentation.